Comments on: seq equivalent http://www.cyberz.org/blog/2008/02/27/seq-equivalent-on-solarismacosx/ Andrea Leofreddi's homepage Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:16:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: brad http://www.cyberz.org/blog/2008/02/27/seq-equivalent-on-solarismacosx/comment-page-1/#comment-1115 brad Thu, 13 Oct 2011 03:37:36 +0000 http://www.cyberz.org/blog/?p=9#comment-1115 for X in $(echo 'for (i=0;i0]s0 0dsis.li 10>0' | dc); do echo $X; done for X in $(echo ‘for (i=0;i0]s0 0dsis.li 10>0′ | dc); do echo $X; done

]]> By: andrea http://www.cyberz.org/blog/2008/02/27/seq-equivalent-on-solarismacosx/comment-page-1/#comment-91 andrea Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:03:20 +0000 http://www.cyberz.org/blog/?p=9#comment-91 The sum is obtained in a recursive way thus causing SEGV on big values (stack overflow) The sum is obtained in a recursive way thus causing SEGV on big values (stack overflow)

]]> By: bruce http://www.cyberz.org/blog/2008/02/27/seq-equivalent-on-solarismacosx/comment-page-1/#comment-89 bruce Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:25:06 +0000 http://www.cyberz.org/blog/?p=9#comment-89 Methinks seq is sane and the above is not. In addition to the convolutions involved, try running it with any big ranges ... on Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris, it dumps core (SEGV) past a range of 100. Convoluted programming==BAD! Methinks seq is sane and the above is not.

In addition to the convolutions involved, try running it with any big ranges … on Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris, it dumps core (SEGV) past a range of 100. Convoluted programming==BAD!

]]> By: Shylo http://www.cyberz.org/blog/2008/02/27/seq-equivalent-on-solarismacosx/comment-page-1/#comment-87 Shylo Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:22:23 +0000 http://www.cyberz.org/blog/?p=9#comment-87 Thanks. We use a mix of various GNU/Linux and Solaris machines at work and it's always bothered me that there was no "seq" on Solaris as I tend to script anything I can and we have a lot of timestamped logs to grep. It's in my ${PATH} now :) Thanks.
We use a mix of various GNU/Linux and Solaris machines at work and it’s always bothered me that there was no “seq” on Solaris as I tend to script anything I can and we have a lot of timestamped logs to grep.
It’s in my ${PATH} now :)

]]> By: signsmanor85 http://www.cyberz.org/blog/2008/02/27/seq-equivalent-on-solarismacosx/comment-page-1/#comment-66 signsmanor85 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:06:30 +0000 http://www.cyberz.org/blog/?p=9#comment-66 Fun forum Fun forum

]]> By: Stafeno http://www.cyberz.org/blog/2008/02/27/seq-equivalent-on-solarismacosx/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Stafeno Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:53:29 +0000 http://www.cyberz.org/blog/?p=9#comment-9 Si può anche utilizzare la seguente espressione: echo {1..5} Ciao Si può anche utilizzare la seguente espressione:
echo {1..5}

Ciao

]]> By: Analfabeta http://www.cyberz.org/blog/2008/02/27/seq-equivalent-on-solarismacosx/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Analfabeta Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:56:38 +0000 http://www.cyberz.org/blog/?p=9#comment-4 Otherwise you can try jot Analfabeta:~ $ jot 5 1 1 2 3 4 5 Otherwise you can try jot

Analfabeta:~ $ jot 5 1
1
2
3
4
5

]]>